Health and Medicine

Statins and Pregnancy: What You Need to Know About Risks and Planning

  • Home
  • Statins and Pregnancy: What You Need to Know About Risks and Planning
Statins and Pregnancy: What You Need to Know About Risks and Planning
23 January 2026 Ian Glover

Statins in Pregnancy Risk Assessment Tool

Your Situation

This tool provides general guidance based on current evidence. Always consult your healthcare provider for personalized medical advice.

For years, doctors told women to stop statins the moment they found out they were pregnant. It wasn’t just a suggestion-it was a hard rule. The fear? That these cholesterol-lowering drugs could cause serious birth defects. But in 2021, the FDA changed its stance. After reviewing data from over a million pregnancies, they removed the strongest warning against statins in pregnancy. This wasn’t a small tweak. It was a full rethink. And it’s changed how doctors talk to women who need these drugs.

Why Were Statins Banned in Pregnancy?

Statins work by blocking HMG-CoA reductase, an enzyme your body uses to make cholesterol. Since cholesterol is critical for building cell membranes-and especially for fetal brain and organ development-scientists worried that lowering it too much might harm the baby. Early animal studies showed birth defects at very high doses. That was enough for regulators to label statins as "Pregnancy Category X"-meaning the risks clearly outweighed any benefits.

But animals aren’t people. And the doses used in those animal studies? Way higher than what humans take. Still, the warning stuck for decades. Even when women accidentally took statins in early pregnancy, they were often told to panic. Many ended up terminating pregnancies out of fear, even though no solid evidence showed harm.

The Data That Changed Everything

In 2015, a massive study looked at 1,152 women who took statins during pregnancy and compared them to nearly 900,000 who didn’t. The results? No meaningful increase in birth defects. The relative risk was 1.07-so close to 1 that it could easily be due to chance. Even after adjusting for things like diabetes, obesity, and smoking, the numbers didn’t budge.

Then came the 2021 JAMA study of over 1.4 million pregnancies. Among the 469 women exposed to statins, there was no rise in congenital anomalies. Same with a 2025 Norwegian study of 805,000 pregnancies. No link to heart defects, limb problems, or neural tube issues. The biggest concern now isn’t birth defects-it’s preterm birth and low birth weight. Even those risks are small and likely tied more to the mother’s underlying heart disease than the statin itself.

And here’s the kicker: the normal background risk of major birth defects in any pregnancy is 3% to 5%. Statins don’t push that number higher. Not meaningfully. Not in humans.

Who Should Still Take Statins During Pregnancy?

For most women, stopping statins is still the right call. Cholesterol naturally rises during pregnancy-it’s normal. And unless you have a serious condition, you don’t need to treat high cholesterol while pregnant. The real exception? Women with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) or established cardiovascular disease.

FH affects 1 in 250 women. Their LDL cholesterol can be over 190 mg/dL from birth. Without treatment, they face a 50% chance of a heart attack before age 50. During pregnancy, the added strain on the heart can be dangerous. One woman in a BabyCenter forum shared: "My LDL was 320 before I got pregnant. My doctor said the risk of a heart attack was worse than any risk from the statin. So I stayed on 10mg of atorvastatin the whole time. My baby is healthy."

For these women, the risk of a heart attack, stroke, or plaque rupture during pregnancy can be life-threatening. In those cases, continuing statins may be the safer choice.

Medical team and patient discussing pregnancy and statins with glowing charts and data

What Do Experts Recommend Now?

There’s no universal answer. The FDA says doctors can consider continuing statins for women at "very high risk" for heart events. The American College of Cardiology agrees. But the European Society of Cardiology still advises stopping statins at pregnancy recognition-except in "exceptional circumstances."

Dr. Cynthia Maxwell from the University of Toronto puts it simply: "It’s not about whether statins cause birth defects. It’s about whether stopping them puts the mother at greater risk."

For women with FH or ASCVD, the decision isn’t made by one doctor. It’s a team effort: cardiologist, maternal-fetal medicine specialist, and the patient. Shared decision-making is key. You need to know your numbers, your history, and your risks. No one-size-fits-all answer exists.

When and How to Stop (or Keep) Statins

If you’re planning pregnancy and take statins, talk to your doctor at least 3 months before trying to conceive. That’s when you can switch to safer options if needed-like bile acid sequestrants or lifestyle changes. But if you’re already pregnant and taking statins, don’t panic.

Most exposures happen before a woman knows she’s pregnant. That’s common. And if it happens? The data says: don’t terminate the pregnancy. The risk of birth defects isn’t increased. Your baby is likely fine.

For women who continue statins during pregnancy, monitoring is critical. Monthly liver tests. Fetal growth scans starting at 20 weeks. Close tracking of blood pressure and cholesterol. Some clinics now have formal protocols. Others are still catching up. A 2022 survey found only 17% of community practices had clear guidelines-compared to 42% at academic centers.

Pregnant woman holding newborn with translucent child growing up surrounded by health icons

What About the Baby Later On?

So far, there’s no evidence that statin exposure in utero affects long-term child development. No studies show learning delays, behavioral issues, or heart problems later in life. But long-term data is still limited. That’s why the NIH is launching the PRESTO study in 2025, tracking 5,000 pregnancies exposed to statins to see how these kids develop into adolescence.

For now, the message is simple: if you took statins early in pregnancy and your baby is growing normally, there’s no reason to assume harm. Don’t wait for a perfect study to feel safe. The evidence we have is strong enough to reassure.

What’s Next? New Uses, New Hope

Statins might not just be safe in pregnancy-they could be helpful. The StAmP trial is testing pravastatin to prevent preeclampsia in high-risk women. Early results showed a 47% drop in preeclampsia. That’s huge. Preeclampsia kills mothers and babies. If statins can reduce that risk, it could change prenatal care forever.

The FDA is now actively encouraging research into drugs like statins for use during pregnancy. This isn’t just about safety anymore. It’s about finding treatments for conditions that currently have none.

What Should You Do Right Now?

  • If you’re planning pregnancy and take statins: Talk to your doctor. Don’t stop on your own. There are safer alternatives for most women.
  • If you’re pregnant and taking statins: Don’t panic. Most exposures are harmless. Call your OB or a pregnancy exposure hotline like MotherToBaby.
  • If you have FH or heart disease: Get a team involved. Cardiologist + MFM specialist + you. Make a plan before you get pregnant.
  • If you took statins before knowing you were pregnant: Your baby is likely fine. No need for extra scans or tests unless your doctor recommends them for other reasons.

The old fear-that statins cause birth defects-isn’t supported by the science. The new reality? For some women, continuing statins might save their lives. The shift isn’t just about drugs. It’s about trusting data over fear. And that’s a change worth celebrating.

Can statins cause birth defects during pregnancy?

No, large studies involving over a million pregnancies show no increased risk of major birth defects from statin exposure during pregnancy. The background risk of birth defects is 3-5%, and statins do not raise that rate. Early concerns were based on animal studies using extremely high doses, which don’t reflect human use.

Should I stop statins if I’m pregnant?

For most women, yes-stop statins once pregnancy is confirmed. But if you have familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) or established cardiovascular disease, continuing may be safer than stopping. The decision should be made with your cardiologist and maternal-fetal medicine specialist, weighing your personal risk of heart events against theoretical fetal risks.

What if I took statins before I knew I was pregnant?

You’re not alone. About 18% of calls to MotherToBaby in 2022 were from women who took statins before realizing they were pregnant. The data shows no increased risk of birth defects from early exposure. Most doctors now reassure patients in this situation. There’s no need to terminate the pregnancy based on statin use alone.

Are there safer alternatives to statins during pregnancy?

For mild to moderate high cholesterol, diet, exercise, and fiber supplements are first-line. Bile acid sequestrants like cholestyramine are considered safe during pregnancy and may be used if medication is needed. But for women with FH or severe heart disease, these alternatives often aren’t enough. Statins may still be the best option.

Is it safe to breastfeed while taking statins?

Yes. Statins don’t pass into breast milk in significant amounts. The American Academy of Pediatrics considers them compatible with breastfeeding. Most experts agree the benefits of breastfeeding far outweigh any minimal theoretical risk from trace amounts of statin in milk.

Will my baby need extra monitoring if I took statins during pregnancy?

Routine prenatal care is usually sufficient. No special ultrasounds or tests are needed solely because of statin exposure. However, if you have FH or heart disease, you may already need more frequent monitoring for fetal growth or preeclampsia-which is related to your condition, not the statin.

Can statins help prevent preeclampsia?

Early research suggests yes. The StAmP trial found that pravastatin taken from 12-16 weeks reduced preeclampsia risk by 47% in high-risk women. While not yet standard care, this is one of the most promising developments in maternal-fetal medicine in years. Larger trials are underway to confirm these results.

How common is statin use among women of childbearing age?

Statin use in women aged 20-44 in the U.S. rose from 3.2% in 2005-2006 to 6.8% in 2017-2018. With more women delaying pregnancy and rising rates of obesity and heart disease, an estimated 12,000-15,000 pregnancies each year involve women who were taking statins at conception.

Ian Glover
Ian Glover

My name is Maxwell Harrington and I am an expert in pharmaceuticals. I have dedicated my life to researching and understanding medications and their impact on various diseases. I am passionate about sharing my knowledge with others, which is why I enjoy writing about medications, diseases, and supplements to help educate and inform the public. My work has been published in various medical journals and blogs, and I'm always looking for new opportunities to share my expertise. In addition to writing, I also enjoy speaking at conferences and events to help further the understanding of pharmaceuticals in the medical field.

15 Comments

  • Jamie Hooper
    Jamie Hooper
    January 25, 2026 AT 04:35

    so like... i took statins for 3 months before i knew i was pregnant?? and my kid is now 2 and runs like a cheetah?? šŸ¤·ā€ā™‚ļø no defects, no weirdness, just a tiny human who steals my fries. the docs said panic, but my gut said nah. and guess what? i’m still here. and so is he.

  • Helen Leite
    Helen Leite
    January 25, 2026 AT 13:59

    THEY’RE HIDING THE TRUTH!! 😱 statins are just the BEGINNING… next they’ll say vaccines are safe in utero!! 🚨 the pharmaceutical giants are manipulating the FDA!! 🤫 my cousin’s friend’s sister had a baby with 6 fingers and they said it was ā€˜coincidence’!! 😭

  • Tommy Sandri
    Tommy Sandri
    January 26, 2026 AT 20:47

    The evolution of clinical guidelines reflects the maturation of epidemiological evidence. The shift from categorical contraindications to risk-stratified recommendations demonstrates a more nuanced understanding of pharmacological safety in pregnancy. This represents a paradigmatic advancement in maternal-fetal therapeutics.

  • Luke Davidson
    Luke Davidson
    January 27, 2026 AT 02:16

    man i just read this whole thing and i’m crying a little?? not because i’m emotional (ok maybe a little) but because this is what medicine SHOULD look like - not fear, not blanket bans, but real data, real people, real choices. i have a friend with FH and she’s got a 4-year-old who loves dinosaurs and hates broccoli. she stayed on her statin. her heart’s fine. his heart’s fine. that’s the win.


    we need more stories like this. not just stats. real humans. real lives. thank you for writing this.

  • asa MNG
    asa MNG
    January 28, 2026 AT 02:13

    ok but what if the statin makes the baby gay?? šŸ¤” i heard this one doc on tiktok say it messes with fetal hormones?? and what about the 5G? are they in the pills too?? 🤯 i mean… i’m not saying… but my aunt’s neighbor’s dog got sick after eating a pill bottle and now it barks in spanish?? šŸ¶šŸ—£ļø

  • Sushrita Chakraborty
    Sushrita Chakraborty
    January 29, 2026 AT 04:11

    While the data presented is compelling and statistically robust, it is imperative to acknowledge the limitations inherent in observational studies. Confounding variables, such as maternal comorbidities and lifestyle factors, may influence outcomes. Furthermore, long-term neurodevelopmental follow-up remains incomplete. A cautious, evidence-based, and individualized approach remains the gold standard.

  • Josh McEvoy
    Josh McEvoy
    January 31, 2026 AT 02:46

    so i took statins during my first trimester… and now my kid is 3 and he draws dragons that breathe fire?? šŸ‰ i don’t know if it’s the statin or if he’s just a weirdo like me… but he also says he remembers being a fish in another life. so… šŸ¤·ā€ā™€ļø

  • Heather McCubbin
    Heather McCubbin
    January 31, 2026 AT 05:25

    they always say ā€˜the science says’ but who funded the science?? šŸ¤” big pharma paid for all those studies… and now they’re pushing statins in pregnancy like it’s a new energy drink?? women are being manipulated into thinking it’s ā€˜safe’ so they’ll keep buying pills… and the real issue? the fact that we’re even having this conversation means we’ve lost our way

  • Sawyer Vitela
    Sawyer Vitela
    February 1, 2026 AT 11:51

    1. No increased birth defect risk. 2. FH and ASCVD exceptions. 3. Breastfeeding fine. 4. Preeclampsia trial promising. 5. Stop if you’re not high risk. Done.

  • Shanta Blank
    Shanta Blank
    February 3, 2026 AT 03:57

    they turned a medical guideline into a TED Talk and now everyone’s calling it a ā€˜revolution’?? 🤔 it’s not a revolution - it’s a correction. we stopped panicking over a myth. the real drama? that it took 20 years and a million pregnancies to fix a stupid rule based on rat studies. i’m just mad we didn’t do this sooner.

  • Tiffany Wagner
    Tiffany Wagner
    February 4, 2026 AT 01:20

    i had no idea this was even a thing until i read this. i’m pregnant and on statins for FH. i’ve been scared to tell anyone. now i feel less alone. thank you.

  • Chloe Hadland
    Chloe Hadland
    February 5, 2026 AT 12:20

    my mom took statins when she was pregnant with me in 1998. i’m 26 now, got a degree, ride a bike, and eat tacos. no birth defects, no weirdness. just a regular human. the fact that we’re still debating this feels wild.

  • Amelia Williams
    Amelia Williams
    February 6, 2026 AT 22:42

    okay but imagine if we treated every medication this way? what if we said ā€˜we don’t know if this is safe’ and just let people die because we were scared? statins aren’t magic - but for some women, they’re the thing keeping them alive. and that’s worth celebrating. not hiding. not shaming. just… letting people live.


    also, if your baby is healthy, stop worrying. the science is on your side.

  • Viola Li
    Viola Li
    February 8, 2026 AT 15:23

    so now we’re just going to ignore the precautionary principle? what’s next? giving babies caffeine in utero because ā€˜it didn’t hurt in the study’? this is how society unravels. one ā€˜but the data says’ at a time.

  • Dolores Rider
    Dolores Rider
    February 10, 2026 AT 00:58

    they said the same thing about thalidomide… and then the babies came out with no arms… what if this is the next thalidomide?? 🤫 they’re hiding it… they always hide it… i checked the FDA website and the font changed… that’s a sign… 😨

Write a comment

Error Warning

More Articles

Menopause and Creativity: How to Rediscover Your Passions
Ian Glover

Menopause and Creativity: How to Rediscover Your Passions

Discover how menopause affects creativity and learn practical, low‑pressure ways to reignite your passions. This guide offers science‑backed tips, habit‑building tools, and real‑life stories to help you thrive creatively during midlife.

Helping Your Partner Cope with Depressive Disorder - Practical Guide
Ian Glover

Helping Your Partner Cope with Depressive Disorder - Practical Guide

Learn practical steps to support a partner with depressive disorder, from recognizing signs to communication, therapy options, daily coping tools, and crisis care.

Dental Anesthesia and Anticoagulants: How to Safely Manage Bleeding Risks
Ian Glover

Dental Anesthesia and Anticoagulants: How to Safely Manage Bleeding Risks

Learn how to safely manage dental procedures while on blood thinners. Discover why stopping anticoagulants is often riskier than bleeding, and what dentists actually do to control bleeding without interrupting your medication.